The end of Central Bank dominance
As monetary policy shifts course, the macro risk balance will transform with it
- Central banks are exiting the post-Lehman one-way street of loose monetary policy in droves which is bringing about a regime shift in monetary policy.
- The central bank pendulum is slowly swinging from easing to tightening. From a top-down perspective, this marks nothing less than a sea change, as all the three major central banks in the world are signalling tighter monetary policy.
- Current market optimism is partly driven by hopes for fiscal support to supplant monetary support. But fiscal dominance is a dangerous answer to the end of central bank dominance. It would deteriorate rather than improve the balance of macroeconomic risks, forcing central banks to “over-tighten” in a weak growth environment.
- Abstaining from significant fiscal stimulus is the best response to the monetary regime shift, despite the short-term disappointments this might cause.
There is a lot of noise about the paradigm shifts looming on the horizon of political change, but whether or not conjecture becomes reality remains to be seen. There is, however, one significant change that will undoubtedly impact investors. Central banks are exiting the post-Lehman one-way street of loose monetary policy in droves which is bringing about a regime shift. This has important investor implications, as the almost universal monetary support for asset returns and macro stability is being eroded.
Although a headwind to growth, monetary tightening as such is not a bad thing when the economy is heating up. But if significant fiscal stimulus is added to the policy mix, it might bring us closer to the end of this cycle rather than prolonging it, as many are currently thinking. Consequently, this link also is a key determinant for whether current market optimism is justified.
The central bank pendulum is slowly swinging from easing to tightening. From a top-down perspective, this marks nothing less than a sea change, as all the three major central banks in the world are signalling tighter monetary policy. In the wake of rising optimism in the US economy, the Fed has entered the early stage of an interest rate hiking cycle. Although thus far a shallow hiking path, the risk right now is tilted towards hawkish surprises from the Fed. If better sentiment translates into higher growth, the world’s most important central bank might even consider a reduction of its balance sheet in a not too distant future, adding unconventional to conventional monetary tightening. In Europe, the ECB is reducing the pace of its bond purchases and rising inflation has produced more hawkish voices in and around Frankfurt’s Euro Tower where rate hike expectations are beginning to appear on the monetary policy horizon. Finally, even the Chinese central bank is on a tightening course — it was actually the first major central bank to raise rates in 2017. An extremely easy monetary policy has been one of the main drivers behind remarkable macro and market stability since the Great Financial Crisis. Consequently, as monetary policy shifts course, the macro risk balance will transform with it.
From monetary to fiscal dominance? Be careful what you wish for
So how will this regime shift impact the overall macro risk balance and, therefore, market direction? Crucially, the outcome is dependent on the interaction between fiscal and monetary policies, particularly in the US. The difference compared to earlier tightening cycles is that growth – although improving – is much weaker than it was before the crisis. The addition of elevated political uncertainty has rendered the macroeconomic foundation shaky at best. Hence, many investors are hoping that fiscal dominance will replace central bank dominance, leaving the overall macro risks unchanged. The theory goes like this: As fiscal support would replace central bank support, this would then lift growth and asset prices further.
But this might be wishful thinking. Fiscal stimulus is not reducing macro and market risks at the current juncture. To the contrary, opening the fiscal spending spigots actually increases macro risks when economies run at full capacity, like the US is doing. It sows the seeds of overheating further down the road, forcing central banks to counteract. Keep in mind that fiscal stimulus expectations are an important reason for Fed tightening in the first place. In a structurally weak growth environment, bold fiscal stimulus could therefore derail the recovery indirectly, as it would force central banks to tighten more forcefully than currently expected.
Monetary policy and fiscal policy are complements, not substitutes. If significant fiscal stimulus were to happen in the US, more Fed tightening would be unavoidable. At best, this would neutralise the fiscal impact on growth. At worst, it would create a vicious feedback loop, strangling the recovery in the private sector that is already happening. The world is still awash with debt, more so than during the heights of the credit crisis. This amplifies the potential negative effects of central bank tightening. Market optimism based on a one-sided focus on the positives of government spending waves is therefore misplaced. Instead of lifting growth and returns it would increase downside potential.
The bottom line: Less is more
The end of central bank dominance marks a regime shift. The impact on market direction is a reflection of how the overall balance of macroeconomic risks will be affected. In this context, fiscal response from governments will be key. Current market optimism is partly driven by hopes for fiscal support to supplant monetary support. But fiscal dominance is a dangerous answer to the end of central bank dominance. In fact, it would deteriorate rather than improve the balance of macroeconomic risks, forcing central banks to “over-tighten” in a weak growth environment. The recent hawkish signals from the Fed can be seen as an early warning sign. In this case, less is actually more: Abstaining from significant fiscal stimulus is the best response to the monetary regime shift, despite the short-term disappointments this might cause.
About Nordea Asset Management
Nordea Asset Management (NAM, AuM 217 bn EUR*), is part of the Nordea Group, the largest financial services group in Northern Europe (AuM 323 bn EUR*). NAM offers European and global investors exposure to a broad set of investment funds. We serve a wide range of clients and distributors which include banks, asset managers, independent financial advisors and insurance companies.
Nordea Asset Management has a presence in Cologne, Copenhagen, Frankfurt, Helsinki, London, Luxembourg, Madrid, Milan, New York, Oslo, Paris, Sao Paulo, Singapore, Stockholm, Vienna and Zurich. Nordea’s local presence goes hand in hand with the objective of being accessible and offering the best service to clients.
Nordea’s success is based on a sustainable and unique multi-boutique approach that combines the expertise of specialised internal boutiques with exclusive external competences allowing us to deliver alpha in a stable way for the benefit of our clients. NAM solutions cover all asset classes from fixed income and equity to multi asset solutions, and manage local and European as well as US, global and emerging market products.
*Source: Nordea Investment Funds, S.A., 31.12.2016
Nordea Asset Management is the functional name of the asset management business conducted by the legal entities Nordea Investment Funds S.A., Nordea Funds Ltd and Nordea Investment Management AB (“the Legal Entities”) and their branches, subsidiaries and affiliated companies. This document is intended to provide the reader with information on Nordea’s specific capabilities. This document (or any views or opinions expressed in this document) does not amount to an investment advice nor does it constitute a recommendation to invest in any financial product, investment structure or instrument, to enter into or unwind any transaction or to participate in any particular trading strategy. This document is not an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any security or instruments or to participate to any such trading strategy. Any such offering may be made only by an Offering Memorandum, or any similar contractual arrangement. Consequently, the information contained herein will be superseded in its entirety by such Offering Memorandum or contractual arrangement in its final form. Any investment decision should therefore only be based on the final legal documentation, without limitation and if applicable, Offering Memorandum, contractual arrangement, any relevant prospectus and the latest key investor information document (where applicable) relating to the investment. The appropriateness of an investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s full circumstances and objectives. Nordea Investment Management recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies as well as encourages investors to seek the advice of independent financial advisors when deemed relevant by the investor. Any products, securities, instruments or strategies discussed in this document may not be suitable for all investors. This document contains information which has been taken from a number of sources. While the information herein is considered to be correct, no representation or warranty can be given on the ultimate accuracy or completeness of such information and investors may use further sources to form a well-informed investment decision. Prospective investors or counterparties should discuss with their professional tax, legal, accounting and other adviser(s) with regards to the potential effect of any investment that they may enter into, including the possible risks and benefits of such investment. Prospective investors or counterparties should also fully understand the potential investment and ascertain that they have made an independent assessment of the appropriateness of such potential investment, based solely on their own intentions and ambitions. Investments in derivative and foreign exchange related transactions may be subject to significant fluctuations which may affect the value of an investment. Investments in Emerging Markets involve a higher element of risk. The value of the investment can greatly fluctuate and cannot be ensured. Published and created by the Legal Entities adherent to Nordea Asset Management. The Legal Entities are duly licensed and supervised by the Financial Supervisory Authority in Sweden, Finland and Luxembourg respectively. The Legal Entities’ branches, subsidiaries and affiliated companies are duly licensed as well as regulated by their local financial supervisory authority in their respective country of domiciliation. Source (unless otherwise stated): Nordea Investment Funds S.A. Unless otherwise stated, all views expressed are those of the Legal Entities adherent to Nordea Asset Management and any of the Legal Entities’ branches, subsidiaries and affiliated companies. This document may not be reproduced or circulated without prior permission. Reference to companies or other investments mentioned within this document should not be construed as a recommendation to the investor to buy or sell the same, but is included for the purpose of illustration. The level of tax benefits and liabilities will depend on individual circumstances and may be subject to change in the future.© The Legal Entities adherent to Nordea Asset Management and any of the Legal Entities’ branches, subsidiaries and/or affiliated companies.