Trouble in Turkey, Mixed picture in India

Sébastien Galy, Sr. Macro Strategist Nordea Asset Management  

Trouble in Turkey

The Turkish economy is barely out of a recession but is being helped by a falling rate of inflation. This is due to a base effect, or in other words, the fact that prices rose so much in the past, courtesy of a run on the Turkish Lira, that they are now rising far more slowly by comparison. As inflation falls, most observers expect the Turkish central bank to ease in order to keep the cost of money, in real terms, even. Another way to look at this is that as price pressure eases so does the need to fight against it. In this environment, the government decided to fire the head of the central bank and replace him with his deputy. There are two plausible reasons for this:1) The government wants to take credit for the cycle of easing 2) The government wants a more aggressive easing cycle than is priced into the market. The Turkish Lira reacted by dropping 2.8% suggesting the market is going for the second reason, which is not necessarily self-evident. Moving forward, the market tentatively will be looking for the government to send a clear signal of its intentions. We expect that the central bank will follow a steady pace of easing leading to further weakness in the Lira and, hence, some imported inflation.

The problem in Turkey is that the private sector accumulated dollar debt hoping that the Turkish Lira would appreciate while borrowing at very low costs. The odds are that they did the same with the Euro. Unfortunately, the central bank’s foreign reserves are relatively small and include 20% of household deposits in commercial banks. This means that the central bank can’t afford much intervention in the currency market.

The path forward will likely be a difficult one for the economy as households and corporates are unnerved by hard currency debt and rising demand for hard currency. Nonetheless, the economy should continue to trough and maintain a steady but slow pace of growth. Its main risk is oil imports. If oil prices spike, the impact on the economy would be difficult to handle and the central bank would need to tighten as economic activity plunges.


Caution is warranted in Turkey particularly on the credit side given the slow pace of economic growth and risk of a weaker Turkish Lira. The odds of an impact on developed economies is limited, though this does matter for Germany.

Mixed picture in India

The Indian economy is slowing down as a function of weaker internal demand. We expect this process to continue as the government has yet to address the problems in the shadow banking sector. They have given the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) a remit to control the sector, but it will take months for them to address the problem and take remedial actions such as additional funding and some deleveraging. The RBI has been known to lower liquidity requirements for banks in the past and is likely to let these higher risk investors have lower risk requirements. The critical exercise will be for the RBI to gain the trust of the investors, and for this it will require months of work on site. As a consequence, the slowdown in consumer demand within rural areas, and some specific sectors such as real estate investments, are likely to continue.

Surprisingly, the Indian government failed to react to this with greater fiscal expansion. The deficit is forecasted to be 3.3% of GDP from 3.4% currently. Concern about the country’s overall debt level may be responsible for the government’s reluctance to expand fiscally. Without support for infrastructure, the government is left to rely on external demand and the middle class. External demand is likely to stay subdued until China troughs, likely within the next three to six months. That leaves a middle-class demand, which remains robust. The election of Narendra Modi likely reassured consumers, which means that demand is likely to be decent although unemployment is relatively high. Nonetheless, there are troubling aspects, such as a low level of productivity in the economy. Overall, it suggests that the economic slowdown could continue by another percentage point. While India remains one of the growing economies in the world, this slowdown should eventually reverse the situation.


With such a difficult environment, earnings expectations are depressed and underestimate the reaction function of the central bank. The equity market is likely to stay expensive as earnings expectations improve and deliver a subdued performance relative to the rest of Asia.

  1. The shadow banking sector hurt growth

Failures in the banking sector (e.g. Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services default) deprive access to capital for higher risks clients such as real estate companies and rural households. The Wall Street Journal, for example, reports that car sales in India were down 19% in May. More broadly, financing conditions in the shadow banking sectors worsened considerably leading to fewer and more expensive loans as non-performing loans rose to 6.1%. In reaction to this, the government decided that non-banking finance companies would come under the control of the Reserve Bank of India as would housing finance companies. This unfortunately could take two quarters.

  1. Heat and lack of rain is an issue

A very weak monsoon season in June is not expected to continue according to India’s Meteorological Department, though it for now impacts farmers and hence GDP growth. Heat waves between March and July have become more intense, frequent and longer (CNN) and could eventually make parts of the densely inhabited India very hard to live in with water shortages. Experts believe heat waves could spread to the whole of India. By the year of 2100, all parts of Asia would not exceed the limits of survivability under a +2.25C scenario, however if no measure against climate change is taken, the Chota Nagpur Plateau and Bangladesh would reach that threshold. Other areas of India would come close to becoming unlivable without Air Conditioning (+35C). India has taken a series of measures against this. It is a signatory to the Paris Accord and pledged to reduce its carbon emissions by 33 – 35% below 2005 levels by 2030 in part by using solar power, though the country would remain reliant on coal.

  1. Structurally weak trade balance

With a manufacturing and Emerging Market slowdown, a rebound in exports depends in part on Chinese growth rebounding within the next three to six months. This would be a cyclical rebound, while the problem for India is a structural one as it maintains a persistently negative trade balance. Its manufacturing sector seems under-developed (15% of GDP) and fails to take advantage of a rising wave of educated youth. Indeed, only one of India’s top 10 companies is a global brand, Tata Motors. One should note the persistent issue of a heavy dependency on commodity imports, primarily energy, coal and gold.

  1. Long-term issue: Productivity

One of the key issues for relatively weak consumption and exports is that the Indian economy’s productivity has been relatively low for a while. There is, in essence, hoarding of labor and sectors that are still human intensive at a time when capital rather than humans should increasingly play a role. A large part of the economy is comprised of small companies with little access to innovation (Livemint). Upskilling workers in such small companies is likely a significant issue. Faced with this, households are likely limiting consumption and big-ticket investments. The government has shown willingness, albeit limited, to force new foreign competition and ideas. For example, the government is now allowing 100% FDI (from 49%) in insurance intermediaries in the latest budget as part of steps to liberate Foreign Direct Investments. More importantly, the government says it will open up sectors such as aviation, media, insurance and animation (CNBC) which is deflationary. Local sourcing restrictions will be eased for FDIs in single-brand retail sector.


Patience is warranted with India. It may take another quarter or two for growth to reverse. Till then demand related sectors are likely to still have some difficulties.


About Nordea Asset Management

Nordea Asset Management (NAM, AuM 217.2bn EUR*), is part of the Nordea Group, the largest financial services group in Northern Europe (AuM 300.2bn EUR*). NAM offers European and global investors’ exposure to a broad set of investment funds. We serve a wide range of clients and distributors which include banks, asset managers, independent financial advisors and insurance companies.

Nordea Asset Management has a presence in Cologne, Copenhagen, Frankfurt, Helsinki, London, Luxembourg, Madrid, Milan, New York, Oslo, Paris, Santiago de Chile, Singapore, Stockholm, Vienna and Zurich. Nordea’s local presence goes hand in hand with the objective of being accessible and offering the best service to clients.

Nordea’s success is based on a sustainable and unique multi-boutique approach that combines the expertise of specialised internal boutiques with exclusive external competences allowing us to deliver alpha in a stable way for the benefit of our clients. NAM solutions cover all asset classes from fixed income and equity to multi asset solutions, and manage local and European as well as US, global and emerging market products.

*Source: Nordea Investment Funds, S.A., 31.03.2019

Nordea Asset Management is the functional name of the asset management business conducted by the legal entities Nordea Investment Funds S.A. and Nordea Investment Management AB (“the Legal Entities”) and their branches, subsidiaries and representative offices. This document is intended to provide the reader with information on Nordea’s specific capabilities. This document (or any views or opinions expressed in this document) does not amount to an investment advice nor does it constitute a recommendation to invest in any financial product, investment structure or instrument, to enter into or unwind any transaction or to participate in any particular trading strategy. This document is not an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any security or instruments or to participate to any such trading strategy. Any such offering may be made only by an Offering Memorandum, or any similar contractual arrangement. Consequently, the information contained herein will be superseded in its entirety by such Offering Memorandum or contractual arrangement in its final form. Any investment decision should therefore only be based on the final legal documentation, without limitation and if applicable, Offering Memorandum, contractual arrangement, any relevant prospectus and the latest key investor information document (where applicable) relating to the investment. The appropriateness of an investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s full circumstances and objectives. Nordea Investment Management recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies as well as encourages investors to seek the advice of independent financial advisors when deemed relevant by the investor. Any products, securities, instruments or strategies discussed in this document may not be suitable for all investors. This document contains information which has been taken from a number of sources. While the information herein is considered to be correct, no representation or warranty can be given on the ultimate accuracy or completeness of such information and investors may use further sources to form a well-informed investment decision. Prospective investors or counterparties should discuss with their professional tax, legal, accounting and other adviser(s) with regards to the potential effect of any investment that they may enter into, including the possible risks and benefits of such investment. Prospective investors or counterparties should also fully understand the potential investment and ascertain that they have made an independent assessment of the appropriateness of such potential investment, based solely on their own intentions and ambitions. Investments in derivative and foreign exchange related transactions may be subject to significant fluctuations which may affect the value of an investment. Investments in Emerging Markets involve a higher element of risk. The value of the investment can greatly fluctuate and cannot be ensured. Investments in equity and debt instruments issued by banks could bear the risk of being subject to the bail-in mechanism (meaning that equity and debt instruments could be written down in order to ensure that most unsecured creditors of an institution bear appropriate losses) as foreseen in EU Directive 2014/59/EU. Nordea Asset Management has decided to bear the cost for research, i.e. such cost is covered by existing fee arrangements (Management-/Administration-Fee). Published and created by the Legal Entities adherent to Nordea Asset Management. The Legal Entities are licensed and supervised by the Financial Supervisory Authority in Sweden and Luxembourg respectively. The Legal Entities’ branches, subsidiaries and representative offices are licensed as well as regulated by their local financial supervisory authority in their respective country of domiciliation. Source (unless otherwise stated): Nordea Investment Funds, S.A. Unless otherwise stated, all views expressed are those of the Legal Entities adherent to Nordea Asset Management and any of the Legal Entities’ branches, subsidiaries and representative offices. This document may not be reproduced or circulated without prior permission. Reference to companies or other investments mentioned within this document should not be construed as a recommendation to the investor to buy or sell the same but is included for the purpose of illustration. The level of tax benefits and liabilities will depend on individual circumstances and may be subject to change in the future. © The Legal Entities adherent to Nordea Asset Management and any of the Legal Entities’ branches, subsidiaries and/or representative offices.


Follow our latest posts